Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Audi Q5 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 7 HP more power than Audi Q5, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1410 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.63 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail and Audi Q5 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. Nissan X-Trail has 61 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 26 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |