Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 16 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 124 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 7.3 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |