Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Kia Sportage 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 15 HP more power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Kia Sportage. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Sportage is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1470 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Sportage gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i40, Hyundai ix35, Kia Optima | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.64 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 16 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 491 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 59 litres more trunk space than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Kia Sportage has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Kia Sportage, so Kia Sportage quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |