Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Subaru Forester 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 - 165 HP | 125 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 270 NM | 184 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 13.7 seconds | 6.3 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 10.0 | 8.5 - 11.0 | |
|
Nissan X-Trail petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is larger. Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | no data | |
| Nissan X-Trail has 4 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.4 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`010 | ~ 1`844 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |