Nissan Terrano 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Nissan Terrano engine produces 11 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 10.1 | |
| Nissan Terrano consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is smaller. Nissan Terrano is 10 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1700 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |