Nissan Terrano 2002 vs Land Rover Discovery 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 17.1 seconds | |
| Nissan Terrano engine produces 17 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 43 NM more than Land Rover Discovery. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 10.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 12.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Terrano consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Terrano consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Discovery engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Patrol | Used also on Land Rover Defender | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Terrano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.90 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Discovery, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1970 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |