Nissan Terrano 2002 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 154 HP | 169 HP | |
Torque: | 304 NM | 233 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 15 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 71 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Terrano consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Terrano consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
830 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Nissan Terrano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 25 years | 24 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Patrol | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.81 m | 1.68 m | |
Nissan Terrano is 10 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 13 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 479 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 1742 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 364 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Terrano (by 158 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Nissan Terrano can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`050 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |