Nissan Terrano 2002 vs Hyundai Terracan 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 345 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Terracan is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 9 HP less power than Hyundai Terracan, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Hyundai Terracan. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Terrano consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Terrano consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Patrol | Used also on Kia Carnival | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Terrano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Terracan engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 2 cm longer than the Hyundai Terracan, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 1955 litres | |
|
Hyundai Terracan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 1055 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Terracan. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Terracan (by 55 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai Terracan, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`620 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Hyundai Terracan has
| |