Nissan Terrano 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 HP | 165 HP | |
Torque: | 278 NM | 373 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 40 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.1 | |
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 90 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.83 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
Nissan Terrano is smaller. Nissan Terrano is 10 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 415 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 1253 litres | |
Nissan Terrano has 300 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Terrano (by 647 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`510 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |