Nissan Terrano 1993 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 HP | 121 HP | |
| Torque: | 197 NM | 284 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 19.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Terrano is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Terrano engine produces 3 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, but torque is 87 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 10.3 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 10 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`580 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |