Nissan Sentra 2006 vs Honda Accord 2011

 
Nissan Sentra
2006 - 2009
Honda Accord
2011 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 135 HP156 HP
Torque: 191 NM192 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds9.3 seconds
Nissan Sentra engine produces 21 HP less power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Honda Accord.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.76.9
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Nissan Sentra consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Sentra could require 120 litres more fuel.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Accord engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 12 years18 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Primera, Nissan SerenaUsed also on Honda CR-V
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.73 m
Width: 1.79 m1.84 m
Height: 1.51 m1.44 m
Nissan Sentra is smaller, but higher.
Nissan Sentra is 16 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Sentra is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 371 litres467 litres
Honda Accord has more luggage space.
Nissan Sentra has 96 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord.
Turning diameter: no data11.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7451`935
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data6800
Pros and Cons:
    Honda Accord has
    • more power
    • lower fuel consumption
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv