Nissan Sentra 2006 vs Mazda 3 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan Sentra
2006 - 2009
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 (petrol)1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 135 HP84 - 265 HP
Torque: 191 NM122 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds6.1 - 14.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.3 - 7.74.7 - 9.7
Nissan Sentra petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.42 m
Width: 1.79 m1.76 m
Height: 1.51 m1.46 m
Nissan Sentra is larger.
Nissan Sentra is 15 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Sentra is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 371 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1229 litres
Nissan Sentra has more luggage capacity.
Nissan Sentra has 71 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: no data10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`745~ 1`808
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data2000
Pros and Cons: Nissan Sentra has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv