Nissan Sentra 2006 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 135 HP | 84 - 265 HP | |
Torque: | 191 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 7.7 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
Nissan Sentra petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.51 m | 1.46 m | |
Nissan Sentra is larger. Nissan Sentra is 15 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Sentra is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | 300 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1229 litres | |
Nissan Sentra has more luggage capacity. Nissan Sentra has 71 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`745 | ~ 1`808 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Sentra has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |