Nissan Qashqai 2010 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 - 150 HP | 117 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 - 320 NM | 154 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13 seconds | 10 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.2 | 5.7 - 8.1 | |
|
Nissan Qashqai petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. On average, a Nissan Qashqai with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mitsubishi ASX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1513 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Qashqai has 9 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. This could mean that the Nissan Qashqai uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 294 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`985 | ~ 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |