Nissan Pulsar 2015 vs Renault Clio 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pulsar is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Pulsar engine produces 80 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 89 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Nissan Pulsar reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 55 litres | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Nissan Pulsar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 535 percent more cases than Nissan Pulsar, so Nissan Pulsar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pulsar has
|
Renault Clio has
| |