Nissan Pulsar 2014 vs Renault Clio 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 190 HP | 75 - 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 260 NM | 105 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 12.7 seconds | 9.3 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 - 5.1 | 4.7 - 7.5 | |
|
Nissan Pulsar petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Nissan Pulsar equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Nissan Pulsar is larger. Nissan Pulsar is 36 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pulsar is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Pulsar has more luggage capacity. Nissan Pulsar has 97 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pulsar is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Nissan Pulsar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`768 | ~ 1`628 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pulsar has
|
Renault Clio has
| |