Nissan Patrol 1998 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 NM | 390 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.4 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Patrol engine produces 47 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 138 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Nissan Patrol reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 11.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Patrol consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Nissan Patrol over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Patrol consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 4 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Nissan Patrol is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Patrol is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 605 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Patrol is 0.6 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Nissan Patrol can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`700 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |