Nissan Patrol 2004 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 441 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Patrol engine produces 40 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 61 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Nissan Patrol reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Patrol consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Patrol could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Patrol consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Pajero engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Terrano | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Patrol might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.15 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Nissan Patrol is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Patrol is 25 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 7 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Patrol is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 810 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2226 litres | 1790 litres | |
|
Nissan Patrol has more luggage capacity. Nissan Patrol has 595 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Patrol (by 436 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Patrol is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Nissan Patrol can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`110 | 2`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |