Nissan Pathfinder 2005 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 11 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pathfinder is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pathfinder consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Nissan Pathfinder over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Pathfinder gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is larger, but lower. Nissan Pathfinder is 13 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2091 litres | 2047 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Pathfinder has 589 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 44 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Nissan Pathfinder can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`793 | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |