Nissan Pathfinder 2010 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder 2010 is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Pathfinder 2010 engine produces 57 HP more power than Nissan Pathfinder 2005, whereas torque is 147 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder 2005. Thanks to more power Nissan Pathfinder 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pathfinder 2005 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Pathfinder 2010 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder 2005, which means that by driving the Nissan Pathfinder 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Pathfinder 2010 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder 2005. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Infiniti FX, Nissan Navara | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Pathfinder 2010 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Pathfinder 2010 is 7 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder 2005, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2091 litres | 2091 litres | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder 2005 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Pathfinder 2010 has 325 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder 2005. This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder 2010 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder 2010 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder 2005, which means Nissan Pathfinder 2010 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`980 | 2`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |