Nissan Pathfinder 2010 vs Land Rover Discovery 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Pathfinder and Land Rover Discovery have the same engine power, but Nissan Pathfinder torque is 10 NM more than Land Rover Discovery. Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pathfinder is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that by driving the Nissan Pathfinder over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Pathfinder gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Pathfinder engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Discovery engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is smaller. Nissan Pathfinder is 3 cm shorter than the Land Rover Discovery, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2091 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 0.5 metres more than that of the Land Rover Discovery, which means Nissan Pathfinder can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`880 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
| |