Nissan Pathfinder 2010 vs Toyota Hilux 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 46 HP more power than Toyota Hilux, whereas torque is 107 NM more than Toyota Hilux. Thanks to more power Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Hilux is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Hilux gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is 45 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, 9 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | 900 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2091 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Hilux has more luggage space. Nissan Pathfinder has 385 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Hilux. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 1.3 metres less than that of the Toyota Hilux, which means Nissan Pathfinder can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`880 | 2`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |