Nissan Pathfinder 1997 vs Nissan Terrano 1996

 
Nissan Pathfinder
1997 - 2001
Nissan Terrano
1996 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.7 Diesel2.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 131 HP125 HP
Torque: 279 NM278 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds16.7 seconds
Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 6 HP more power than Nissan Terrano, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Nissan Terrano.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.510.5
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 150 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres72 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway770 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.53 m4.66 m
Width: 1.82 m1.76 m
Height: 1.75 m1.85 m
Nissan Pathfinder is 13 cm shorter than the Nissan Terrano, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres115 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1670 litres1900 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Pathfinder has 320 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Terrano. The Nissan Terrano may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Terrano (by 230 litres).
Turning diameter: no data11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 42002200
Pros and Cons: Nissan Pathfinder has
  • roomier boot
Nissan Terrano has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv