Nissan Pathfinder 1997 vs Nissan Terrano 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 125 HP | |
Torque: | 334 NM | 278 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 16.7 seconds | |
Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 25 HP more power than Nissan Terrano, whereas torque is 56 NM more than Nissan Terrano. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 10.5 | |
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 72 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
800 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.85 m | |
Nissan Pathfinder is 13 cm shorter than the Nissan Terrano, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 115 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1670 litres | 1900 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Pathfinder has 320 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Terrano. The Nissan Terrano may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Terrano (by 230 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Nissan Terrano has
| |