Nissan Pathfinder 2001 vs Isuzu Rodeo 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 220 HP | 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 363 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 15 HP more power than Isuzu Rodeo, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Isuzu Rodeo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 | 12.5 | |
|
The Isuzu Rodeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Pathfinder consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu Rodeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Isuzu Rodeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Murano | Used also on Opel Frontera | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is larger. Nissan Pathfinder is 13 cm longer than the Isuzu Rodeo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 933 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1670 litres | 2297 litres | |
|
Isuzu Rodeo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Pathfinder has 498 litres less trunk space than the Isuzu Rodeo. This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Isuzu Rodeo (by 627 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Isuzu Rodeo has
| |