Nissan Pathfinder 2016 vs Mazda CX-9 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.5 | 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 284 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 352 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 10.7 | 8.4 - 8.8 | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-9. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.04 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Pathfinder is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 407 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2251 litres | 2017 litres | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Pathfinder has 46 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-9. The Mazda CX-9 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 234 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-9. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`717 | ~ 2`605 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |