Nissan Pathfinder 2005 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.0 | 2.7 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 - 269 HP | 140 - 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 - 403 NM | 295 - 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 12.3 seconds | 8.3 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 13.5 | 9.7 - 16.5 | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Nissan Pathfinder equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Pathfinder is 13 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2091 litres | 2047 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Pathfinder has 589 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 44 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Nissan Pathfinder can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`822 | ~ 2`447 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |