Nissan Pathfinder 2010 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 (diesel) | 2.2 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 231 HP | 150 - 233 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 550 NM | 317 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 11 seconds | 8.9 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 9.5 | 6.9 - 11.2 | |
|
On average, Nissan Pathfinder equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is 31 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2091 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Pathfinder has 240 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`913 | ~ 2`169 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |