Nissan Pathfinder 2010 vs Toyota Hilux 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 | 2.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 231 HP | 144 - 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 550 NM | 343 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 11 seconds | 12 - 13.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 9.5 | 7.3 - 8.6 | |
|
On average, Nissan Pathfinder equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is 45 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, 4 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | 900 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2091 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Hilux has more luggage space. Nissan Pathfinder has 385 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Hilux. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 1.3 metres less than that of the Toyota Hilux, which means Nissan Pathfinder can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`913 | ~ 2`717 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |