Nissan Pathfinder 2012 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Pathfinder is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC60 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 - 260 HP | 136 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 - 368 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 8.7 seconds | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 - 10.5 | 5.3 - 10.7 | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is larger. Nissan Pathfinder is 36 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 7 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2260 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Pathfinder has 42 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 805 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`401 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |