Nissan Navara 2005 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001

 
Nissan Navara
2005 - 2010
Jeep Grand Cherokee
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.7 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Double-row timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 144 HP163 HP
Torque: 356 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 seconds11.2 seconds
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving.
Nissan Navara engine produces 19 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.19.7
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Nissan Navara consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 26 years3 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan MuranoUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Navara might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 5.22 m4.61 m
Width: 1.85 m1.84 m
Height: 1.75 m1.84 m
Nissan Navara is larger, but lower.
Nissan Navara is 61 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Navara is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data1104 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2047 litres
Turning diameter: no data11.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`8052`506
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 66003400
Pros and Cons: Nissan Navara has
  • lower fuel consumption
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv