Nissan Navara 2005 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 5.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 324 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 461 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 59 HP less power than Chevrolet Tahoe, whereas torque is 76 NM less than Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 12.7 | |
|
The Chevrolet Tahoe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Navara could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Chevrolet Suburban | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Tahoe engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.13 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.96 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 9 cm longer than the Chevrolet Tahoe, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3084 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |