Nissan Navara 2005 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 4.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 30 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Despite less power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 12.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 13.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 615 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 96 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Navara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.89 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 33 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 1.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |