Nissan Navara 2005 vs Audi Q7 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 233 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Navara engine produces 59 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 97 NM less than Audi Q7. Due to the lower power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 500'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q7 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Navara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi Q7 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 13 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 1.3 metres more than that of the Audi Q7, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |