Nissan Navara 2010 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 53 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 200 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.7 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Navara could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Navara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.40 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 14 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 1.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |