Nissan Navara 2010 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 77 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Navara could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Navara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Navara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.40 m | 5.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 19 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 1.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |