Nissan Navara 1998 vs Volvo XC90 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo C30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volvo XC90 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 42 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2404 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |