Nissan Navara 1998 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 48 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 74 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 72 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 20 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |