Nissan Navara 2005 vs Ford Ranger 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Navara is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Ford Ranger has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Navara is available only with rear wheel drive, while Ford Ranger can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.0 | 2.3 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 - 265 HP | 84 - 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 - 385 NM | 195 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.5 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 13.8 | 8.9 - 10.2 | |
|
On average, Nissan Navara equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 14 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`489 | ~ 2`986 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |