Nissan Murano 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 333 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Murano is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Murano engine produces 83 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 40 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 10.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Murano could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.86 m | |
| Nissan Murano is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Murano is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2005 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`295 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |