Nissan Murano 2002 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006

 
Nissan Murano
2002 - 2008
Jeep Grand Cherokee
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.5 Petrol3.7 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 248 HP201 HP
Torque: 333 NM307 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 seconds10.7 seconds
Nissan Murano is more dynamic to drive.
Nissan Murano engine produces 47 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 26 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.313.2
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Nissan Murano consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Nissan Murano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 82 litres78 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle590 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway760 km on highway
Nissan Murano gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 24 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan PathfinderInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.75 m
Width: 1.88 m1.87 m
Height: 1.69 m1.74 m
Nissan Murano is larger, but lower.
Nissan Murano is 2 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Murano is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 923 litres978 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2005 litres1909 litres
Despite its longer length, Nissan Murano has 55 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Nissan Murano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 96 litres).
Turning diameter: no data11.2 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`295no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 26006200
Pros and Cons: Nissan Murano has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv