Nissan Murano 2002 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 HP | 269 HP | |
| Torque: | 333 NM | 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Nissan Murano engine produces 21 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Nissan Pathfinder. Despite less power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 13.5 | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Nissan Murano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Murano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is larger, but lower. Nissan Murano is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Murano is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2005 litres | 2091 litres | |
| Nissan Murano has 733 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 86 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`295 | 2`793 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |