Nissan Murano 2002 vs Infiniti FX 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 HP | 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 333 NM | 366 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Infiniti FX is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Murano engine produces 32 HP less power than Infiniti FX, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Infiniti FX. Due to the lower power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 12.1 | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Infiniti FX, which means that by driving the Nissan Murano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Nissan Murano) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Infiniti FX) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 24 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Murano is 4 cm shorter than the Infiniti FX, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Murano is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | 776 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2005 litres | 1826 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Murano has 147 litres more trunk space than the Infiniti FX. The Infiniti FX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 179 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`204 | 2`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Infiniti FX has
| |