Nissan Murano 2008 vs Subaru B9 Tribeca 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 334 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Nissan Murano engine produces 11 HP less power than Subaru B9 Tribeca, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Subaru B9 Tribeca. Despite less power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 11.6 | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, which means that by driving the Nissan Murano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Nissan Murano is 3 cm shorter than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Murano is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 235 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Murano has 167 litres more trunk space than the Subaru B9 Tribeca. The Subaru B9 Tribeca may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
| |