Nissan Murano 2011 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Murano engine produces 57 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Murano consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Murano could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Murano consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Pathfinder | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Murano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Nissan Murano is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Murano is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1554 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Murano has 380 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Nissan Murano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Murano is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`495 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |