Nissan Murano 2011 vs Mazda CX-5 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 256 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Murano engine produces 2 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, but torque is 194 NM more than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.3 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Murano could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Murano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Pathfinder | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Murano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda CX-5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is larger. Nissan Murano is 32 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Murano is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 403 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Nissan Murano has 1 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Murano is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Nissan Murano can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`495 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |