Nissan Murano 2002 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Nissan Murano is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Nissan X-Trail has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 3.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 234 - 248 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
Torque: | 318 - 333 NM | 192 - 314 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 8.9 seconds | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 12.3 | 7.1 - 10.0 | |
Nissan Murano petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
Nissan Murano is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Murano is 26 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 12 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | 410 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2005 litres | 1841 litres | |
Nissan Murano has more luggage capacity. Nissan Murano has 513 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 164 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Murano is 1.4 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Nissan Murano can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`293 | ~ 2`009 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |