Nissan Murano 2002 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Nissan Murano is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Outlander has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 3.5 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 234 - 248 HP | 136 - 201 HP | |
Torque: | 318 - 333 NM | 176 - 303 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 8.9 seconds | 7.7 - 12.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 12.3 | 9.1 - 10.1 | |
Nissan Murano petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.54 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.62 m | |
Nissan Murano is larger. Nissan Murano is 23 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 13 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Murano is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | 402 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2005 litres | 1705 litres | |
Nissan Murano has more luggage capacity. Nissan Murano has 521 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 300 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Murano is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Nissan Murano can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`293 | ~ 2`041 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |