Nissan Murano 2010 vs BMW X5 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Murano is available with front wheel drive, while BMW X5 can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 | 3.0 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 255 HP | 245 - 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 334 - 450 NM | 400 - 740 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 10.5 seconds | 5.4 - 7.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 10.6 | 7.4 - 12.5 | |
|
Nissan Murano petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW X5. On average, Nissan Murano equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Nissan Murano and BMW X5 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1750 litres | |
|
BMW X5 has more luggage space. Nissan Murano has 218 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Murano is 1 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Nissan Murano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`438 | ~ 2`799 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
BMW X5 has
| |