Nissan Micra 2000 vs Mazda Demio 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 57 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 95 NM | 116 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.7 seconds | 13 seconds | |
Mazda Demio is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 18 HP less power than Mazda Demio, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Mazda Demio. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 7.3 | |
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Micra consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Demio, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 43 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
970 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.75 m | 3.82 m | |
Width: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.54 m | |
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda Demio, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 330 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1298 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda Demio, which means Nissan Micra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | high | |
Mazda Demio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda Demio, so Mazda Demio quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Mazda Demio has
| |