Nissan Micra 2003 vs Renault Clio 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 65 HP | 65 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Nissan Micra and Renault Clio have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Micra consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
1150 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
950 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.72 m | 3.81 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.42 m | |
Nissan Micra is 9 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Micra is 12 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | 255 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
584 litres | 1037 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Micra has 116 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 453 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`515 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Renault Clio has
| |